sibhusky
-
Posts
3909 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
48
Posts posted by sibhusky
-
-
Good luck though, I may just be at your mountain one day this winter, and I'm not joking....
You ought to come during the NorAms, Feb 9 to 16. Not only is it thrilling, but gatekeepers get a ticket for the day and one to use within a year. You could essentially ski all week for free by gatekeeping every other day.
-
Sixteen minutes in summer. Twenty, more or less, in winter. Depends on the amount of snow on the road.
-
Mr. Husky works out of the house. He's an SAP (complicated system that big corporations use to run their operations) expert. He just rolls out of bed in his PJ's and logs on to the computer.
I needed some money for myself, tho, and am working part time in a store downtown.
-
i'm surprised skidude didn't whore them all for himself. Sib, doesn't it bother you being SO far away from it all? I have a question, when you worked at Agere, where did you live? Allentown? Bethlehem? Quite a change...I'm pretty sure Ski999 say you worked at agere, you're lucky to get out of there, my uncle, and several of my friend's dads were layed off
I did work for a while out in Allentown, but back then it was AT&T Microelectronics. We were out on in an industrial park by the airport. I had a great corner office that overlooked the airport runway and if I'd ever had the time to enjoy it, I could have watched the planes taking off and landing all day. I lived in NJ, tho, and as soon as I could blackmail them enough, I demanded to move back to NJ as the commute was too long. Siblet was an infant and it was too far away for a mom to be.
-
Hey Skimom, did you "stick it" to Sib? Good to know we have some representation on the left coast
I did not receive my stickers.....
-
I thought of that. However, we didn't have a refrig in our room.
Sure you did, it was in the armoire the TV was on.
(The benefits of the siblet working at that place are all these little tidbits of information.)
-
congrats on your 200th post
yea, what does she have strapped to her back? lol, looks as if shes going on a hike for a year
and what exactly does this bear repellant do? Will it really stop a 300 lb beast from mowing you down? 
and my last question, does it work on skidudes? 
Let's see...two complete rain outfits for anyone not properly dressed in case of a downpour, a roll of TP and extra bags to "pack it out", pepper spray, knit hat and gloves in case of snow (I just keep this stuff in the pack in case I'm further from home on a hike), digital camera, sweater, Camelbak, Atkins meal bar, matches, space blanket, sunglasses, visor, spare dry sox, can't remember what else. Basically, the backpack is ready for whatever comes up whether I am hiking locally or in Glacier. I am sure I am missing some things that I just haven't learned I need yet.
Pepper spray. Hope I NEVER have to use it. Only good if the bear is almost on you or IS on you. You need to worry about the direction of the wind as well! But two guys have saved their own lives this year using it as the bear was mauling them. Our local mountain IS grizzly territory.
-
In that case Volkl makes the best GS ski ever.
At one point I thought mark was running 8s....Hmmm Eitehr way he knows his stuff, and if I was in the market for new bindings, I would probably listen to him, all other things being equal.
I love my 13.07 hc
Mark was running in the single digits, but hasn't raced as much in recent years. Maybe, like me, he likes actually SKIING better than standing around in his more mature years.
I notice Brad, from the Loft, is still skiing down around 8 HC, though.
-
The only Volkl I've ever been on was the P30, I think---whichever was orange. That was a long time ago. I don't remember a thing about it, so I guess it wasn't a memorable ski. My oldest raced on them in Maine and she loved the new Volkl's. And I remember Picabo used them pacesetting. Maybe they are chick skis, 'Dude?
As I recall, the siblet chose them over another brand last year (without the opportunity to demo them -- the trouble with "race skis" is they have to be demo'd the summer before or you don't get in the race purchase program...) because her coach said the girls preferred the Volkls.
-
Yeah, true, but every year I hear that a different part of your anatomy is more important to protect. Better rear release...better twisting release...better forward whatever...Or is it just the binding's durabilty? IDK, but the only binding I ever broke was from jumping off the Shawnee lift on a dare. I think prelease is the worst kind of release.
You want it to release when it should release. Personally, I can't remember ever falling with a pre-release. In fact, 90% of the few times I fall, they don't release at all.
And, as you know, I have the stats on the number of times I fell every year for the last 16 seasons or so.
-
And it's not "safest" to have your bindings cranked to the highest number, ski999 is being facetious. Yes, it's a pain to go look for a ski, but it's better than a trip to the ER and an instant end to your skiing for the season.
-
Personally, I'd like to hear from the repair shops AT the mountains about which bindings and skis are falling to bits. They're the ones who probably get the upset skier first and at least at CB, they were part of the mountain, not the ski shop so they had no interest in backing one ski or binding over another.
-
Them's fighting words to some on this board. I don't like Atomic, either, but it's entirely due to the fact that you have to use their bindings, which are a pain to lock up on a rack and don't click together good to carry around. That's more of a user-friendly design issue, not a quality issue. I think you need to be more specific about what you mean.
For instance, do their race skis chatter at speed? Do the skis fall apart with general skiing? Do the edges dull faster than other skis?
With the arrival of shaped skis, it is pretty tough to read a review, waltz into a shop and buy a ski and have gotten the best ski for your type of skiing. Different lengths in the same ski behave differently in a much more pronounced fashion than in the past. Before we pretty much just worried about flex and length, now we have sidecut thrown in as well. Fifteen years ago, I could get some demo skis and have the hang of what made them perform in an hour or so. Not anymore. Different skis seem to demand radically different skiing styles and the ski you like will probably be the one that forces you to change how you ski the least when you first get on it. I now do two full days of testing on a ski before I plunk down money. The end result is a slow migration in my ski style with each new pair of skis. If I'd jumped from my straight skis to my current skis, I am sure I would have hated them, but I've been thru a gradual change to shorter and turnier skis with each of my last few pairs, rather than the big leap. So, the fact that you may not LIKE a pair of skis is more a reflection of what you LIKE and not a reflection of the ski's quality. I think there are very few BAD skis out there, just skis that are not right for a particular person.
Now, if your comment is based on skis that do not do the job they are supposed to do because of inferior workmanship or marketing to the wrong audience by the manufacturer, then that's a different story.
Unfortunately there are far too many people out there buying skis that are wrong for them because they are not honest with themselves about their ability level and because they allow their friends or a magazine to influence them. Many people cannot separate problems with their ability and their technique from problems with a ski itself. Many do not understand that if one length in a ski isn't working for them that a different length may be the answer and not a different ski.
Personally, I hate soft skis. I like a ski with snap at the end of a turn, but that will not be thrown off course by crud on the trail. I like a ski that I can get on edge fast and that will handle whatever I throw at it. Sometimes a ski will be too lively for me and it makes me nervous about its holding ability. But, at least I know what the issue is, and that is the ski is wrong for ME. It doesn't mean someone else won't love it.
-
Well, if you are not racing FIS or USSA (which most on this board are not), then you can get what's best.
If you are racing, then here is what USSA and Diann Roffe have to say:
==============
Alpine equipment rules updated 9/20/04
The past decade has seen tremendous advancements in alpine ski equipment design, snow surface preparation and ski preparation. These changes have made our sport easier to learn and more efficient to master; they have also increased speeds to excessive levels. FIS and USSA control equipment and regulate course setting in an effort to slow the speeds in alpine racing.
USSA has had some success in effecting FIS equipment rules in an effort to keep those rules simple and not too restrictive. However, the FIS has found it necessary to establish rules throughout the alpine program, from Children to Masters.
The process to establish equipment rules for USSA racing has evolved over a 2-year period in order that athletes, clubs, coaches and particularly the manufacturers could anticipate the requirements. After extensive consideration and debate the USSA Alpine Sports Committee determined that it is necessary to bring USSA athletes into compliance with FIS ski equipment rules.
Coaches and officials are encouraged communicate, educate and help bring athletes into compliance with the rules.
USSA Competition Regulations
Article1.3.1.1
A competitor may only take part in a USSA competition with equipment that conforms to USSA Regulations. Competitors are responsible for the equipment they use (skis, bindings, ski boots, suit, etc.) It is their duty to check that the equipment conforms to the USSA specifications and general safety requirements and is in working order.
The regulations for season 2004/2005 can be downloaded by clicking here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Following are comments from World Champion Diann Roffe regarding FIS and USSA equipment regulations.
The recent changes to the USSA equipment regulations have been evolving over a 2-year period in order that athletes, clubs, coaches and particularly the manufacturers could anticipate the requirements and provide continuity from USSA to FIS racing. Ski development originates with the world's top athletes and 99.9% of the time our sport is driven from the FIS and World Cup competition level. We ascertained long ago the danger of extreme sidecut and a ski that is too short. We have had several years to assess ski development and how it affects safety. Granted it took a while to have a trickle down effect at our regional clubs, but our ultimate goal should always be the safety of our athletes. I grew up skiing on my brother's hand me down skis and they were always "a bit big" for me. I certainly learned something about keeping my hips up over the skis to stay balanced. I was too small to turn them any other way!
I realize the current concerns are different, but the point is that the FIS/USSA is not doing this on a whim... Ski companies have become more and more radical in recent years. Junior skis have been created that are lighter, easier to turn and made carving much truer for a young athlete. This was all good. What came about, was a realization that the use of more lateral pressure and shorter skis, shows a younger athlete that carving is possible, much earlier in their progression than ever before.
Safety issues only came about when you took a World Cup athlete and added 200 pounds of power, an exacting carve technique, steep, icy terrain, and high turn speeds. The number of knee injuries and dynamic crashes skyrocketed. The shorter lengths could not support the speed and turn radius of World Cup courses. The FIS took the next step and added more turns to the speed events and modified course setting at the FIS level to keep up with technology. The manufacturers responded and created more capped and laminate variations of skis to get the edge up on the new course setting trend. The FIS finally responded with height/sidecut/length restrictions to regulate the amount of forces being created that were catapulting athletes out of the course in a high-speed turn. This in turn regulated the manufacturers R&D.
As this has taken years to trickle down, the problem that has been created is fundamental. Our younger athletes have learned a technique on junior skis that has revolutionized skiing at the J3 and J4 level. It works on slower courses and flatter, shorter hills. As an athlete grows in strength and age, the physics of running courses change. Athletes ski faster, the courses are longer, steeper and more difficult. All of this while they weigh more. With the creation of more forces, the injuries start.
The age requirements for the ski length/sidecut regulations come in a critical year. We have a responsibility to prepare our kids for this change. With starting the requirements at this age, the kids have a fighting chance to become confident and aggressive a year BEFORE they will most likely race at the FIS level on demanding courses. This is a win-win for safety and athlete development.
How does this affect our racers locally? By fighting the ski requirements for another year, we are essentially holding back our athletes from learning a more aggressive technique early enough to be competitive on longer, steeper, and difficult courses, confidently.
It should be our clubs' vision to prepare our athletes the best we possibly can for success. I feel strongly that the USSA Alpine Sport Committee is right on the money supporting this move. It is for the benefit and safety of our kids skiing.
Diann Roffe
-
I find that tough to believe. I mean the temps down there are rarely dropping into the 30's -- mostly 40's. Has anyone seen the hill itself?
-
If you really want to sell them, you'll give us the exact model, the approximate age, the exact bindings, etc. Who is going to offer you money for something they know nothing about? We're not brand new skiers here, people who buy their equipment at garage sales.
-
Well, here's a bit more discussion of the place on another board.
http://www.snowjournal.com/page.php?cid=topic4770
I kept thinking I had heard the name "Masthope" in the distant past. But I couldn't find it mentioned in some of my older books anywhere.
-
I agree, it's boring, but at least it's not red.
Also, I prefer sites that offer CONTENT over glitz. And the new thing certainly lacks glitz.
-
Actually, as a middle-aged woman, I'd have to say that 95% of the sales people in ski shops spend their time talking down to me as a skier. Most ski shop guys know the stuff that fits THEM and just stereotype anyone else who walks in...like they've got a book that says "accountant = cruiser" or "gray hair = aspiring carver" and they don't spend the time actually getting the true scoop on a person's style and ability.
That's probably the main reason I feel you have to DEMO DEMO DEMO, because rarely does the "recommended" ski meet your requirements.
-
No "used to" about it. Snow is for skiing on, not standing around.
-
Why does this have no value to this board? Aren't we allowed to discuss ski technique?????
-
Possibly a guy from up in Connecticut as near as I can tell.
-
Posted at 10:26 AM Mountain time, 9/20. It could melt before you look, I guess.
-
But powder sucks. It gets in the way of perfectly good skiing. I look forward to a wider use of water injected runs.
One of the guys who works teaching the team here SHATTERED his shoulder last year at the NorAms SLIPPING the course. (I went thru that section, it was like marble on a decided slant -- not my cup of tea.)
wow it was cold today
in General Chat
Posted
Actually, it was in Glacier, just like skimom, that I saw it first. Then I posted a webcam link of snow at the summit of the ski area, but that has since melted.