Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's that time of year I start checking the weather for Mt. Washington multiple times a day and the avalanche report everyday.

Curious if anyone else on here skis, has skied or wants to ski the Presidentials?

  • Like 1
Posted

Because everyone on here dosen’t like when i post without pictures. First set was last February 2019 and last was August 7th of 2019.

004F8B7B-C387-41D6-8E09-DE0BAC6EDFE6.jpeg

258B0ACC-BDE6-4B00-BE5E-1408721DB90B.jpeg

BEE4114E-AAB4-46CC-BE2B-4575F8A84A44.jpeg

ECEFF39E-329A-4FCE-AF85-A682CFE22FFF.jpeg

39ADCA12-5DED-44BD-8EDE-F3CECBB071BE.jpeg

D8162992-4EFE-471A-9C17-33D2A0B7A61A.jpeg

D9700EC1-0F7E-4D76-AB10-1EE49D84A9EB.jpeg

6F569280-663F-4BB0-80EA-3E981E583F8D.jpeg

  • Like 9
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Shadows said:

Is a skin setup necesarry?

Absolutely not! As the tuxs trail is always beaten down by cat transporting volunteer rescue and mwac staff. Also only part truly skinable is from the parking lot to Hojo's (Not even 40% to the summit) anything more is just what conditions allow. It's also no race and sweating means changing layers.

Also anything from the end of April til July be starting the hike in out tail shoes! I have an extra pack to.

Edited by Nipples
  • Like 1
Posted

I've had good luck the first weekend in may every time i've been up there. Definitely don't need skins and touring setup, but I'd rather have my skis on the ground for as much of the climb as possible instead of my back. Probably cause I have heavy frame bindings on heavy, wide skis, though. Something 90-100 underfoot with a lighter binding would probably make packing em not nearly as bad. I have yet to actually get to the weather station at the summit, so that's my goal next time. Bowl is fun, but if there's enough coverage in the snowfields up top, that looks like it'd be super fun.

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, Justo8484 said:

I've had good luck the first weekend in may every time i've been up there. Definitely don't need skins and touring setup, but I'd rather have my skis on the ground for as much of the climb as possible instead of my back. Probably cause I have heavy frame bindings on heavy, wide skis, though. Something 90-100 underfoot with a lighter binding would probably make packing em not nearly as bad. I have yet to actually get to the weather station at the summit, so that's my goal next time. Bowl is fun, but if there's enough coverage in the snowfields up top, that looks like it'd be super fun.

Snow fields from mid April a few years ago.

DA6F35FD-4B23-45B2-8406-CD8EC5177321.jpeg

C56B4BDB-0464-4F39-90C8-16B22401DF53.jpeg

49BABF12-DCC6-4F94-BB0F-26F109754E28.jpeg

  • Like 6
Posted
23 minutes ago, Mixilplix said:

That's way cool..I imagine this would be possible with a board since you can do it without skinning....I got a ton of camping stuff too....

You have skis!

  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, Mixilplix said:

That's way cool..I imagine this would be possible with a board since you can do it without skinning....I got a ton of camping stuff too....

If your on a board. I would highly recommend micro spikes... Watched a boarded slip and take out half the people in the boot ladder one time. I always take my crampons. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, AtomicSkier said:

Way to get after it @Nipples....what happened to all your hair?!  

Doing any resort skiing while you’re up there?

@AtomicSkier I sweat to much for that long hair don’t care life. Note sure... big storm rolling in Later tomorrow. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...